May 10, 2009

Question Unanswered

Since childhood we have been writing letters. Purposes vary, situations vary, styles vary, even mode of writing varies but writing never discontinues and maybe this is the reason that every year, right from 5th standard (or maybe even before that) in each & every English exam, we are tested for writing letters. As we move on to higher class not only our methodology of writing letter ameliorates but also every other thing complementing it (obviously, after so many years of letter writing what else would one expect?).

Unfortunately or fortunately, it so happens that even when I've reached my second year of Degree College, I am still tested for writing letters. I was sitting in front of one of the teachers (or should I call them professors, now that I'm in college), ready to give my viva. She started with the typical questions of the viva. As time elapsed, I became more comfortable and answered more confidently (not that I was shocked by this). By now it had become more of chitchat than a formal viva. Then we came to a point where we started talking about the different layouts of a business letter.

Now anybody studying under the University of Pune, opting for a B.com degree and is in their second year and is referring to Sheth publications would surely know that there are 10 different layouts for writing a letter. When I told her this, she simply asked, "Aren't we making a mountain out of a mole?" Totally agreeing I said, "Yes, I guess we are."

She had asked me exactly the same question that I had been asking myself all the time while mugging the names and the ways of scripting the layout. But the answer to the question ' Why are we doing so?’ I hadn't figured out while I was learning, nor while the communication professor asked me & not even now, days after the exam is over.

Instead of adopting one single format, which everybody uses, we bring about 101 amendments in them and ultimately amalgamate 2 or more and create a number of totally new layouts. But what happens by the end of the day is that we only use one standard format and the rest all are only known to the people who study them (I wonder if even they know all the layouts!?!).

The question still arises in my mind every time I think about it. Why are we so keen in making our life so complicated? As if our life isn't complicated enough.

But as always the question remains unanswered . . .

4 comments:

Unknown said...

I dont have an answer to your question but i just have this one thing to say that ur ending would have a stronger impact if ur second last sentence would have ended with an exclamation..

SD said...

I'll answer your question (Why are we so keen in making our life so complicated?).

Well, the thing is when people have absolutely nothing to do they do weird things - like complicating simple tasks. No one in this entire world can live without thinking. So when there's nothing worthwhile to think about, people "make a mountain out of a mole". There's nothing more to it than this. As long as you are busy, you'll always keep things simple.

Good post...continue writing.

Unknown said...

the only answer i can think of 2 ur quesn. is :
" Change is the only thing constant in life."
so the changing formats of letters i guess....

i remember we were once wondering what PhD. ppl do ? maybe ppl having doctorate degree in English keep changing the layouts of letters
1.to keep themselves engaged or
2.to create an impression that they r working hard
or simply
3.to prove that the saying 'English is a funny language ' is true.

durga-the-writer is interesting ! keep it up !

MOHAMMED FARHAN KHAN said...

well nice post,
actually we made things complex because we want to do something diff. as I knw most of the people chose to perform a task or layout something in a different complex way, coz they want to prove their sui-generis qualities.

and the second reason is, it is quality of writer to write simple thing in a more complex manner, so that his 'writership' would be maintained.

and third reason is already presented @ Shweta

well I really like the "Theory of Phd." given by Mahalaxmi.

May 10, 2009

Question Unanswered

Since childhood we have been writing letters. Purposes vary, situations vary, styles vary, even mode of writing varies but writing never discontinues and maybe this is the reason that every year, right from 5th standard (or maybe even before that) in each & every English exam, we are tested for writing letters. As we move on to higher class not only our methodology of writing letter ameliorates but also every other thing complementing it (obviously, after so many years of letter writing what else would one expect?).

Unfortunately or fortunately, it so happens that even when I've reached my second year of Degree College, I am still tested for writing letters. I was sitting in front of one of the teachers (or should I call them professors, now that I'm in college), ready to give my viva. She started with the typical questions of the viva. As time elapsed, I became more comfortable and answered more confidently (not that I was shocked by this). By now it had become more of chitchat than a formal viva. Then we came to a point where we started talking about the different layouts of a business letter.

Now anybody studying under the University of Pune, opting for a B.com degree and is in their second year and is referring to Sheth publications would surely know that there are 10 different layouts for writing a letter. When I told her this, she simply asked, "Aren't we making a mountain out of a mole?" Totally agreeing I said, "Yes, I guess we are."

She had asked me exactly the same question that I had been asking myself all the time while mugging the names and the ways of scripting the layout. But the answer to the question ' Why are we doing so?’ I hadn't figured out while I was learning, nor while the communication professor asked me & not even now, days after the exam is over.

Instead of adopting one single format, which everybody uses, we bring about 101 amendments in them and ultimately amalgamate 2 or more and create a number of totally new layouts. But what happens by the end of the day is that we only use one standard format and the rest all are only known to the people who study them (I wonder if even they know all the layouts!?!).

The question still arises in my mind every time I think about it. Why are we so keen in making our life so complicated? As if our life isn't complicated enough.

But as always the question remains unanswered . . .

4 comments:

Unknown said...

I dont have an answer to your question but i just have this one thing to say that ur ending would have a stronger impact if ur second last sentence would have ended with an exclamation..

SD said...

I'll answer your question (Why are we so keen in making our life so complicated?).

Well, the thing is when people have absolutely nothing to do they do weird things - like complicating simple tasks. No one in this entire world can live without thinking. So when there's nothing worthwhile to think about, people "make a mountain out of a mole". There's nothing more to it than this. As long as you are busy, you'll always keep things simple.

Good post...continue writing.

Unknown said...

the only answer i can think of 2 ur quesn. is :
" Change is the only thing constant in life."
so the changing formats of letters i guess....

i remember we were once wondering what PhD. ppl do ? maybe ppl having doctorate degree in English keep changing the layouts of letters
1.to keep themselves engaged or
2.to create an impression that they r working hard
or simply
3.to prove that the saying 'English is a funny language ' is true.

durga-the-writer is interesting ! keep it up !

MOHAMMED FARHAN KHAN said...

well nice post,
actually we made things complex because we want to do something diff. as I knw most of the people chose to perform a task or layout something in a different complex way, coz they want to prove their sui-generis qualities.

and the second reason is, it is quality of writer to write simple thing in a more complex manner, so that his 'writership' would be maintained.

and third reason is already presented @ Shweta

well I really like the "Theory of Phd." given by Mahalaxmi.